How Ronda Rousey Lost

originally posted on deadspin.com: http://deadspin.com/how-ronda-rousey-lost-1742721532

1521670116679307410

You’ve seen the kick. We’ve all seen the kick. Left shin meets jaw/neck, and Ronda Rousey is out. It was a brutal, iconic moment, but it’s almost beside the point: Holly Holm was already beating Rousey, and beating her badly. She wasn’t just edging her out; it was total domination from start to finish.

When a fight is so completely one-sided—and in the opposite way you thought it would be—you’re left sitting there wondering how the hell you didn’t see it coming. And how didn’t Rousey?

I think she did, and that this was her downfall…………….click here for more.

Ronda Rousey is a strait G

Ronda Rousey won an ESPY for Best Fighter over several candidates, one of which was Floyd “Money” Mayweather.  Rousey is easily the most dominant women’s fighter in MMA or any other form of martial arts (hair-pulling and bitch-you-don’t-know-me-kung fu), but who knew that she would take to the offensive AFTER winning the ESPY for biggest badass.

The nervous laughs from Jesse Palmer after Rousey’s comments indicate that he was too scared, anxious and slightly turned on yet STILL frightened to even attempt to get a follow-up question out of his spray-tanned face-hole.

If I was Rousey, I would’ve followed with this, “and while we’re on the subject of dumb shit, why am I being presented with this award on the red carpet as I’m walking into the award show?  Why am I NOT on stage receiving this award like a regular human being?!?!”.

hi-res-e0789e52e396bb0929872035117a0d31_crop_north

Seriously, am I the only person who’s wondering why she got this award on the curb, OUTSIDE the building?

Maybe the Academy Awards will adopt this dynamic for the awards that the average film fan doesn’t care much about.

Just start handing out best dramatic short/best sound editing Oscars on the red carpet and give the viewers a break on the acceptance speeches from people no one knows.  “Thanks for coming, you can get right back in your limo and go to the after-party.”

Effeminate Action

Standard practice for Fox Sport’s UFC Fight Night is to offer the event in two shows; “UFC Fight Night Prelims”, immediately followed by “UFC Fight Night”. The idea is that the “Prelims” iteration showcases up and comers while the second show features more well-known, higher ranked fighters who are therefore closer to a Championship fight, or fan favorites.

Usually, The Prelims are exciting matchups with albeit lesser, but to UFC fans, known competitors and the 4/18 event in Newark New Jersey did not disappoint. Among the Prelims, the card featured Ultimate Fighter 19 Champion Corey Anderson being assaulted with a barrage of leg kicks throughout the fight, succumbing to a vicious 3rd round TKO at the hands of Gian Villante.

Also on the card was Ovince St. Preux, known for his tremendous power and vicious kicks and for in his last fight demolishing world re-known MMA legend and ex-heavyweight champ “Shogun” Rua with a 34 second TKO. In this event, Ovince knocked out Patrick Cummins in the 1st round.

The second show, or main card began with what could be construed as “Effeminate Action”. As a strong proponent of Affirmative Action, I’m torn by my opposition to this so-called Effeminate Action. The first matchup on the main card featured two Women fighters, 12th ranked Paige Vanzant vs. 8th ranked Felice Herrig. Who vs. whom?

Paige-VanZant-vs-Kailin-Curran

Women’s UFC Champ Ronda Rousey has undoubtedly popularized Women’s Mixed Martial Arts. She is arguably the current most marketable Mixed Martial Arts athlete. In addition to dominating all opponents, she is a television and film star, product spokesperson, and certified badass. Her popularity has propelled Women’s MMA to new heights, prompting UFC President Dana White to produce the 1st season of The Ultimate Fighter featuring all women Mixed Martial Artists.

Whether it’s Football, with the NFL’s (ridiculous) goal to have a team based in Europe and currently playing one game annually in London, or the NBA with equal aspirations playing games in Mexico, league owners and commissioners from all sports are always looking for ways to grow their fan base…sometimes to the detriment of the sport. Is the UFC following the same path?

The Vanzant vs. Herrig fight was an exciting bout featuring great grappling action, ending in the underdog 12th ranked Vanzant dominating 8th ranked Herrig, controlling the action in the later rounds with skillful ground technique, punishing her with hammer fists, elbows, and all around ground and pound. That being said, did that matchup deserve to “headline” over the St. Preux or Anderson fight? Despite her domination of the higher ranked Herrig, does the 21-year-old Vanzant deserve a Reebok sponsorship over Ovince or any other fighter on the Prelim card, or is she the beneficiary of Effeminate Action?

This particular Women’s MMA bout is a poor example as it was (although IMO not as much so as the Anderson or St. Preux fight’s) entertaining. My take on Effeminate Action however is a simple one; is it about growing the fan base, or is it about inclusion as Dana White and The UFC would assert? If it’s truly about inclusion and at times the product suffers as a result, I support it. Knowing Dana White’s goal of World Domination however precludes me from such optimism and therefore gives me pause when two lesser-known women fighters are featured over 2, 4, or 6 more prominent male fighters. Women’s mixed martial arts can be exciting and deserves a spotlight, but if the fight is featuring the two women at work dating the same dude, let’s be honest about the intentions, and put it on the undercard… just after me vs. my dickhead neighbor, otherwise the product suffers.

 

written by Che K’Hama